The Philippines' Supreme Court has ordered that
the contentious Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, be suspended. See here for
details of some of the protests the law sparked off. The law aims to attack
matters such as online child pornography, cyber sexual activities, identity
theft and spamming. But it gives powerful search and seizure rights to
authorities including to seize data from computers. It also targets online
libel such as social media comment as a criminal offence. 15 petitions against
the law had been filed by groups objecting to it, mostly condemning the libel
provisions as an attack on free speech and the swingeing enforcement powers.
Of course many of the Cybercrime law's legitimate functions are necessary in a modern society but this court order illustrates the risks when government in a democracy strays into regulating what people can say. Add to that a healthy distrust of authorities' abuse of power in the Philippines and the risks can soon seem to outweigh the benefits. See here for a case of suspicious attacks on a legitimate business operator by authorities.
Of course many of the Cybercrime law's legitimate functions are necessary in a modern society but this court order illustrates the risks when government in a democracy strays into regulating what people can say. Add to that a healthy distrust of authorities' abuse of power in the Philippines and the risks can soon seem to outweigh the benefits. See here for a case of suspicious attacks on a legitimate business operator by authorities.
The recent Supreme Court hearings on the proposed Cybercrime law are reported here - http://www.ip-watch.org/2013/01/23/philippines-mulls-suspended-cybercrime-law-restricting-communication/
ReplyDelete