Further to the recent decision in India and the post here IP Komodo thought it helpful to compare known compulsory license terms (known from the media reports at least). Any additional information is welcome, to update, add to or correct this.
Country
|
Date
|
compound
|
Patentee
|
Royalty
|
Purpose
|
Term
|
Indonesia
|
5.10.04
|
lamivudine
|
GSK
|
0.5% of the net sales price
|
for government use
|
Patent expiry 2011
|
Indonesia
|
5.10.04
|
nevirapine
|
Boehringer Ingelheim
|
0.5% of the net sales price
|
for government use
|
Patent expiry 2012
|
Thailand
|
25.1.07
|
efavirenz
|
Merck
|
0.5% of the original cost of the drug
|
public non-commercial use for importation and local production
| |
Thailand
|
25.1.07
|
opinavir/ritonavir
|
Abbott
|
public non-commercial use for importation and local production
| ||
Thailand
|
25.1.07
|
clopidogrelc
|
Sanofi-Aventis & Bristol-Myers Squibb.
|
public non-commercial use for importation and local production
| ||
India
|
9.3.12
|
sorafenib
|
Bayer
|
6% of net sales (up to max. price of 8880 Rps/pack)
|
Manufacture by NATCO only in India.
|
Patent expiry
|
No comments:
Post a Comment